PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADR vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADR vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.05% return.


AADR

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
0.12%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.28%

HERD

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.05%
6M
12.85%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
-1.56%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%6.48%13.13%19.62%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
12.05%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AADR and HERD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.54

The correlation between AADR and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

AADR vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AADR
HERD

Healthcare

17.9%
14.7%

Basic Materials

16.9%
4.7%

Financial Services

14.6%
0.0%

Industrials

14.6%
13.4%

Technology

9.5%
18.0%

Energy

7.6%
15.9%

Communication Services

7.4%
8.3%

Utilities

5.4%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
8.2%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Healthcare

AADR
17.9%
HERD
14.7%

Basic Materials

AADR
16.9%
HERD
4.7%

Financial Services

AADR
14.6%
HERD
0.0%

Industrials

AADR
14.6%
HERD
13.4%

Technology

AADR
9.5%
HERD
18.0%

Energy

AADR
7.6%
HERD
15.9%

Communication Services

AADR
7.4%
HERD
8.3%

Utilities

AADR
5.4%
HERD
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AADR
3.9%
HERD
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

AADR
2.2%
HERD
8.2%

Real Estate

AADR

-

HERD
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADR vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADRHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.45

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

5.19

-4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

17.73

-16.33

AADR vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADR and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADRHERDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

2.54

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.56

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.63

-0.20

Drawdowns

AADR vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADRHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-39.41%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-5.68%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.61%

-18.90%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-21.60%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.54%

-0.67%

-11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-4.55%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

1.66%

+5.16%

Volatility

AADR vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADRHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

2.92%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.55%

7.74%

+9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

11.62%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

17.76%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

20.50%

+1.70%

AADR vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADR vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
0.54%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.13%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADR and HERD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 9.95% vs 6.23% for AADR. On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.54% for AADR.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADR and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer