AADR vs. HAIL
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AADR is actively managed, while HAIL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AADR returned 6.23%/yr vs -5.36%/yr for HAIL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
AADR vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 31.10% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
HAIL
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- 16.87%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -1.56% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 13.13% | 35.35% | -31.55% | 0.03% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 31.10% | 19.62% | -6.98% | 9.65% | -45.72% | 1.95% | 84.33% | 30.63% | -19.96% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and HAIL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AADR and HAIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
AADR vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AADR
HAIL
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Healthcare
AADR
HAIL
-
Basic Materials
AADR
HAIL
Financial Services
AADR
HAIL
Industrials
AADR
HAIL
Technology
AADR
HAIL
Energy
AADR
HAIL
Communication Services
AADR
HAIL
Utilities
AADR
HAIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
AADR
HAIL
Consumer Defensive
AADR
HAIL
-
Real Estate
AADR
-
HAIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
HAIL
AADR vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AADR | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.32 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 3.14 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 9.49 | -8.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AADR | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 2.00 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.17 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.20 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
AADR vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -65.98% | +20.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -18.64% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -40.96% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -63.12% | +28.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -30.85% | +18.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -31.60% | +22.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 6.15% | +0.67% |
Volatility
AADR vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) is 6.34%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that AADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 10.80% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 22.28% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 29.32% | -7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 31.80% | -10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 31.73% | -9.53% |
AADR vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HAIL's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.44% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and HAIL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAIL has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to AADR (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs HAIL's -65.98%.
On 5-year performance, AADR leads with 6.23% vs -5.36% for HAIL. On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AADR has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AADR has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.54% for AADR.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.45% for HAIL.
HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer