AABFX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
AABFX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 28, 1997. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | -2.16% | 12.23% | 10.08% | 12.04% | -13.93% | 11.83% | 8.69% | 16.65% | -5.09% | 10.06% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AABFX has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.73% annualized return.
AABFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AABFX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
AABFX
TMAAX
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AABFX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.94 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.40 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.16 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 5.41 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AABFX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.94 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between AABFX and TMAAX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, less than TMAAX's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 6.76% | 7.25% | 6.43% | 2.97% | 2.26% | 6.99% | 2.03% | 2.37% | 9.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 1.90% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, smaller than the maximum TMAAX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AABFX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -50.54% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.52% | -9.88% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.56% | -26.55% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.40% | -26.99% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -7.55% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -7.41% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 2.12% | -0.78% |
Volatility
AABFX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) is 2.75%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that AABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AABFX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.06% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 7.66% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 13.98% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 13.81% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 13.28% | -4.00% |