PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAC vs. REGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAC vs. REGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AAAC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
6M
2.48%
YTD
2.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REGS

1D
-1.75%
1M
-0.87%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. REGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and REGS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAC vs. REGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAAC vs. REGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. REGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum REGS drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and REGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAACREGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-7.59%

+7.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.81%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-2.41%

+2.37%

Volatility

AAAC vs. REGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAACREGSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85%

20.06%

-19.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.85%

20.06%

-19.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.85%

20.06%

-19.21%

AAAC vs. REGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than REGS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAC vs. REGS - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.65%0.03%
REGS
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAC and REGS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

AAAC is categorized as CLO, while REGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.35% for REGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAC and REGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer