3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L
3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) and 2MSF.L (Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MST.L tracks the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index while 2MSF.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MST.L returned -99.29% vs -25.79% for 2MSF.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3MST.L is traded in USD, while 2MSF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MSF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a -78.63% return, which is significantly lower than 2MSF.L's -27.78% return.
3MST.L
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -71.71%
- YTD
- -78.63%
- 6M
- -88.77%
- 1Y
- -99.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2MSF.L
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- -27.78%
- 6M
- -25.48%
- 1Y
- -25.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | -78.63% | -98.41% | 164.28% |
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -27.78% | 12.39% | -4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MST.L and 2MSF.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MST.L
2MSF.L
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MST.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.98 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.38 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.66 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MST.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.39 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.53 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than 2MSF.L's maximum drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and 2MSF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MST.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -66.92% | -33.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.53% | -66.92% | -32.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -54.07% | -45.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.39% | -19.71% | -65.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.32% | 39.21% | +43.11% |
Volatility
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 61.01% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) at 20.51%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MST.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.01% | 20.51% | +40.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.17% | 48.64% | +111.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.97% | 66.26% | +132.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 54.48% | +181.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 53.68% | +182.61% |
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MST.L and 2MSF.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MST.L vs. 2MSF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MST.L nor 2MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MST.L and 2MSF.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MST.L and 2MSF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while 2MSF.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MST.L and 2MSF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer