PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2MSF.L vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
2MSF.L
Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP
-45.63%4.50%0.63%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-23.84%17.18%82.73%
Different Trading Currencies

2MSF.L is traded in GBp, while MAGX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2MSF.L achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's -23.84% return.


2MSF.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-13.92%
YTD
-45.63%
6M
-52.81%
1Y
-18.49%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*

MAGX

1D
9.13%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
-23.84%
6M
-21.33%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

2MSF.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

2MSF.L vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2MSF.L
2MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2MSF.LMAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

0.64

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

1.29

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.17

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.92

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

2.75

-3.50

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2MSF.L and MAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2MSF.LMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

0.64

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between 2MSF.L and MAGX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

2MSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.


Drawdowns

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, which is greater than MAGX's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MSF.L and MAGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2MSF.LMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-54.19%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.77%

-37.24%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.80%

-31.30%

-34.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-14.05%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.66%

11.65%

+20.01%

Volatility

2MSF.L vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) is 9.74%, while Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a volatility of 15.64%. This indicates that 2MSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2MSF.LMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

15.64%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.67%

30.19%

+26.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.06%

57.04%

+10.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

54.08%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.22%

54.08%

-1.86%