PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3MST.L vs. 2MU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3MST.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP
-76.31%-98.41%112.46%
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
7.04%599.32%-42.57%
Different Trading Currencies

3MST.L is traded in USD, while 2MU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a -76.31% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 7.04% return.


3MST.L

1D
-17.67%
1M
-28.63%
YTD
-76.31%
6M
-98.13%
1Y
-98.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

2MU.L

1D
-8.63%
1M
-41.85%
YTD
7.04%
6M
187.89%
1Y
760.91%
3Y*
108.35%
5Y*
20.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3MST.L and 2MU.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3MST.L
3MST.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
3MST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
3MST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3MST.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

6.35

-6.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.77

3.79

-5.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.49

-0.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

13.02

-14.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.36

38.55

-39.91

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3MST.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3MST.L and 2MU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3MST.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

6.35

-6.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.41

-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between 3MST.L and 2MU.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3MST.L nor 2MU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than 2MU.L's maximum drawdown of -89.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and 2MU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3MST.L2MU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-89.16%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.48%

-53.20%

-46.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-53.20%

-46.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.33%

-45.85%

-38.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.78%

17.92%

+54.86%

Volatility

3MST.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 53.75% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) at 39.46%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3MST.L2MU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.75%

39.46%

+14.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

161.36%

88.88%

+72.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

196.59%

118.91%

+77.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

239.09%

100.52%

+138.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

239.09%

97.93%

+141.16%