3MST.L vs. 3CON.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L).

3MST.L and 3CON.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3MST.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024. 3CON.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. Both 3MST.L and 3CON.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP	-76.31%	-34.04%
3CON.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP	-78.83%	-20.53%

Different Trading Currencies

3MST.L is traded in USD, while 3CON.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3CON.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 3MST.L having a -76.31% return and 3CON.L slightly lower at -78.81%.

3MST.L

• 1D: -17.67%
• 1M: -28.63%
• YTD: -76.31%
• 6M: -98.13%
• 1Y: -98.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3CON.L

• 1D: 6.17%
• 1M: -30.68%
• YTD: -78.81%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3MST.L and 3CON.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

3MST.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP

3CON.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP

Return for Risk

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3MST.L

3MST.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
3MST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
3MST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
3MST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1
3MST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
3MST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3MST.L	3CON.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3MST.L	3CON.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	-0.47	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between 3MST.L and 3CON.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3MST.L nor 3CON.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3MST.L vs. 3CON.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than 3CON.L's maximum drawdown of -90.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and 3CON.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3MST.L	3CON.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-91.21%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.93%	-88.69%	-11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.33%	-57.77%	-26.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	3MST.L	3CON.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	161.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	196.59%	214.10%	-17.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	239.09%	214.10%	+24.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	239.09%	214.10%	+24.99%