PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2MSF.L
Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP
-45.63%4.50%17.75%106.56%-51.52%121.86%56.71%20.79%
2GOO.L
Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP
-21.15%100.64%64.47%106.54%-66.92%166.13%33.93%31.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2MSF.L achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than 2GOO.L's -21.15% return.


2MSF.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-13.92%
YTD
-45.63%
6M
-52.81%
1Y
-18.49%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*

2GOO.L

1D
5.22%
1M
-16.30%
YTD
-21.15%
6M
28.59%
1Y
170.50%
3Y*
61.94%
5Y*
28.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2MSF.L and 2GOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2MSF.L
2MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

2GOO.L
2GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2MSF.L2GOO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

2.95

-3.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

3.41

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

4.31

-4.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

15.27

-16.01

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the 2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2MSF.L and 2GOO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2MSF.L2GOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

2.95

-3.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.49

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between 2MSF.L and 2GOO.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2MSF.L nor 2GOO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, roughly equal to the maximum 2GOO.L drawdown of -69.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MSF.L and 2GOO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2MSF.L2GOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-69.73%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.77%

-35.69%

-31.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.77%

-69.73%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.80%

-32.33%

-33.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-25.45%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.66%

10.08%

+21.58%

Volatility

2MSF.L vs. 2GOO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) is 9.74%, while Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that 2MSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2GOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2MSF.L2GOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

12.82%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.67%

36.95%

+19.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.06%

57.63%

+9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

59.17%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.22%

61.81%

-9.59%