2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L).
2MSF.L and 3GOO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2MSF.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2017. 3GOO.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. Both 2MSF.L and 3GOO.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -45.63% | 4.50% | 17.75% | 106.56% | -51.52% | 121.86% | 0.79% |
3GOO.L Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP | -32.40% | 146.08% | 80.34% | 154.87% | -85.80% | 293.65% | 12.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2MSF.L achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOO.L's -32.40% return.
2MSF.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- YTD
- -45.63%
- 6M
- -52.81%
- 1Y
- -18.49%
- 3Y*
- 1.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- —
3GOO.L
- 1D
- 7.93%
- 1M
- -24.98%
- YTD
- -32.40%
- 6M
- 35.55%
- 1Y
- 283.24%
- 3Y*
- 78.98%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2MSF.L and 3GOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank
2MSF.L
3GOO.L
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2MSF.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 3.25 | -3.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | 3.35 | -3.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 4.97 | -5.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 16.88 | -17.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2MSF.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 3.25 | -3.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between 2MSF.L and 3GOO.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2MSF.L nor 3GOO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, smaller than the maximum 3GOO.L drawdown of -88.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MSF.L and 3GOO.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2MSF.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.77% | -88.06% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.77% | -50.61% | -16.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.77% | -88.06% | +21.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.80% | -46.69% | -19.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -45.52% | +27.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.66% | 14.90% | +16.76% |
Volatility
2MSF.L vs. 3GOO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) is 9.74%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a volatility of 19.88%. This indicates that 2MSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2MSF.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 19.88% | -10.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.67% | 55.49% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.06% | 86.73% | -19.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 89.49% | -37.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.22% | 89.68% | -37.46% |