2B7K.DE vs. CL
2B7K.DE (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, 2B7K.DE returned 10.57%/yr vs 5.19%/yr for CL. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2B7K.DE is traded in EUR, while CL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7K.DE achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 17.58% return.
2B7K.DE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
CL
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7K.DE iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 12.70% | 2.87% | 17.54% | 20.84% | -16.92% | 36.73% | 9.54% | 20.04% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 17.58% | -21.54% | 24.26% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 9.72% | 16.69% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7K.DE and CL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between 2B7K.DE and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7K.DE vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
2B7K.DE
CL
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 2B7K.DE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 0.15 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 0.23 | +10.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CL drawdown of -31.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7K.DE and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7K.DE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -31.74% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -17.29% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.33% | -31.74% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.33% | -31.74% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.05% | +17.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -8.50% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 10.75% | -8.70% |
Volatility
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) is 3.69%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that 2B7K.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7K.DE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 8.61% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 17.72% | -8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 21.89% | -9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 19.18% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 20.47% | -4.28% |
Dividends
2B7K.DE vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
2B7K.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7K.DE iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.31% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7K.DE and CL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 2B7K.DE and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer