10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

10AJ.DE (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - 10AJ.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 10AJ.DE returned 1.87%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for NADQ.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 10AJ.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for NADQ.DE.

Performance

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 10AJ.DE achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than NADQ.DE's 20.63% return.

10AJ.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -2.40%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: —

NADQ.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 18.75%
• 1Y: 37.21%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: 21.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	7.96%	-1.85%	5.52%	6.85%	-20.55%	36.79%	-16.96%	23.88%	1.63%
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist	20.63%	7.04%	34.07%	51.46%	-29.91%	39.75%	34.72%	43.03%	0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.42

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AJ.DE

10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

NADQ.DE

NADQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NADQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
NADQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	10AJ.DE	NADQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.40	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	3.19	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	3.79	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	11.32	-7.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	10AJ.DE	NADQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.40	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.94	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.97	-0.75

Drawdowns

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, which is greater than NADQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	10AJ.DE	NADQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.62%	-33.44%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-9.97%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.52%	-26.70%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.01%	-31.16%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.63%	-0.86%	-5.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-5.93%	-6.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	3.35%	-0.94%

Volatility

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) is 2.70%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NADQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	10AJ.DE	NADQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	4.26%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	10.95%	-2.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	15.74%	-4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	19.84%	-5.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	19.54%	-2.44%

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

10AJ.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than NADQ.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

10AJ.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than NADQ.DE's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.77%	2.99%	2.94%	2.98%	3.23%	2.13%	3.10%	2.92%	2.63%
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist	0.33%	0.40%	0.55%	0.40%	0.79%	0.51%	0.40%	0.54%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE in my portfolio?

10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 10AJ.DE or NADQ.DE?

On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 10AJ.DE or NADQ.DE?

NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for 10AJ.DE.

What is the main difference between 10AJ.DE and NADQ.DE?

10AJ.DE is categorized as REIT, while NADQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. 10AJ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for 10AJ.DE and 0.22% for NADQ.DE.