10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).

10AJ.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 10AJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both 10AJ.DE and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	3.56%	-1.85%	5.52%	6.85%	-20.55%	36.79%	-16.96%	23.88%	1.63%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-2.47%	2.21%	7.44%	0.04%	-0.07%	30.55%	2.69%	27.24%	3.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 10AJ.DE achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -2.47% return.

10AJ.DE

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -5.92%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 2.54%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: —

XDWH.DE

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 6M: 5.35%
• 1Y: -1.28%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

10AJ.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDWH.DE

Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C

10AJ.DE

Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist

Return for Risk

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AJ.DE

10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 15
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

XDWH.DE

XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	10AJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.08	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	0.01	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.00	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	0.01	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	0.01	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AJ.DE and XDWH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	10AJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	-0.08	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.43	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.56	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.89%	2.99%	2.94%	2.98%	3.23%	2.13%	3.10%	2.92%	2.63%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and XDWH.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	10AJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.62%	-26.08%	-16.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.34%	-13.28%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.01%	-21.12%	-8.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.43%	-8.97%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-4.72%	-7.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	5.71%	-2.97%

Volatility

10AJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	10AJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	4.04%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.03%	9.29%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	16.42%	-1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	13.28%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	14.71%	+2.49%