10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE).
10AJ.DE and XYP1.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 10AJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. XYP1.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus 1-3. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013. Both 10AJ.DE and XYP1.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 10AJ.DE or XYP1.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between 10AJ.DE and XYP1.DE is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
10AJ.DE:
0.30
XYP1.DE:
4.08
10AJ.DE:
0.46
XYP1.DE:
6.71
10AJ.DE:
1.07
XYP1.DE:
1.89
10AJ.DE:
0.17
XYP1.DE:
2.64
10AJ.DE:
0.73
XYP1.DE:
33.16
10AJ.DE:
5.61%
XYP1.DE:
0.15%
10AJ.DE:
14.87%
XYP1.DE:
1.17%
10AJ.DE:
-42.62%
XYP1.DE:
-5.77%
10AJ.DE:
-15.15%
XYP1.DE:
-0.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 10AJ.DE achieves a -3.70% return, which is significantly lower than XYP1.DE's 1.44% return.
10AJ.DE
-3.70%
6.77%
-5.87%
4.51%
4.62%
N/A
XYP1.DE
1.44%
0.40%
2.12%
4.81%
0.89%
0.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
10AJ.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XYP1.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
10AJ.DE
XYP1.DE
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Dividend Comparison
10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while XYP1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 3.06% | 2.94% | 2.98% | 3.23% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 2.92% | 2.63% |
XYP1.DE Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, which is greater than XYP1.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and XYP1.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
10AJ.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYP1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.