PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0151.HK vs. KCDMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Want Want China (0151.HK) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0151.HK is traded in HKD, while KCDMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KCDMY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0151.HK achieves a -27.16% return, which is significantly lower than KCDMY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, 0151.HK has underperformed KCDMY with an annualized return of 0.37%, while KCDMY has yielded a comparatively higher 6.26% annualized return.


0151.HK

1D
-1.74%
1M
4.32%
6M
-28.39%
YTD
-27.16%
1Y
-38.10%
3Y*
-11.53%
5Y*
-4.03%
10Y*
0.37%
ALL TIME*
4.35%

KCDMY

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.24%
6M
7.78%
YTD
12.43%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
6.26%
ALL TIME*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HK$56.84MHK$52.31MHK$43.61M
HK$4.30MHK$4.28MHK$4.21M

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0151.HK
Want Want China
-27.16%4.73%2.17%-6.74%-20.57%31.69%-18.31%38.82%-13.51%35.85%
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
12.43%56.07%-28.85%40.28%16.09%-3.37%-10.25%29.28%-4.74%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between 0151.HK and KCDMY is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2008

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0151.HK vs. KCDMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

0151.HK
0151.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
0151.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0151.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
0151.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
0151.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
0151.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

KCDMY
KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Want Want China (0151.HK) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0151.HKKCDMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.20

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.81

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

4.84

-6.56

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0151.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the KCDMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0151.HK and KCDMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0151.HK drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum KCDMY drawdown of -74.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0151.HK and KCDMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0151.HKKCDMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-74.63%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.80%

-17.20%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-40.15%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.71%

-40.15%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.71%

-42.97%

-10.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.57%

-26.61%

-31.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

-46.53%

+15.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.65%

6.41%

+16.24%

Volatility

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Volatility Comparison

Want Want China (0151.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) at 4.53%. This indicates that 0151.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCDMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0151.HKKCDMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

4.53%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

19.68%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.43%

27.97%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.16%

32.19%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.07%

33.84%

-4.77%

Dividends

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Dividend Comparison

0151.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than KCDMY's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0151.HK
Want Want China
4.71%3.43%5.64%3.49%9.28%2.49%5.76%3.80%3.83%2.56%2.86%2.44%
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
5.02%4.82%12.08%3.96%4.24%6.72%4.70%4.08%5.16%7.20%5.68%3.98%

Financials

0151.HK vs. KCDMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Want Want China and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0151.HK values in HKD, KCDMY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0151.HK and KCDMY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0151.HK and KCDMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer