PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0151.HK vs. CALM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0151.HK vs. CALM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Want Want China (0151.HK) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0151.HK is traded in HKD, while CALM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CALM values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0151.HK achieves a -27.16% return, which is significantly lower than CALM's 12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, 0151.HK has underperformed CALM with an annualized return of 0.37%, while CALM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


0151.HK

1D
-1.74%
1M
-0.29%
6M
-28.39%
YTD
-27.16%
1Y
-38.64%
3Y*
-11.53%
5Y*
-4.03%
10Y*
0.37%
ALL TIME*
4.35%

CALM

1D
0.79%
1M
9.09%
6M
5.97%
YTD
12.64%
1Y
-16.97%
3Y*
31.39%
5Y*
26.83%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HK$56.84MHK$52.31MHK$43.61M
HK$844.19MHK$710.31MHK$558.97M

0151.HK vs. CALM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0151.HK
Want Want China
-27.16%4.73%2.17%-6.74%-20.57%31.69%-18.31%38.82%-13.51%35.85%
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
12.64%-15.45%86.03%14.47%52.13%-0.84%-12.58%1.55%-3.69%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between 0151.HK and CALM is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2008

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0151.HK vs. CALM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

0151.HK
0151.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
0151.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0151.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
0151.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
0151.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
0151.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CALM
CALM Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CALM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CALM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

0151.HK vs. CALM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Want Want China (0151.HK) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0151.HKCALMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.93

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.46

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-0.67

-1.05

0151.HK vs. CALM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0151.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the CALM Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0151.HK and CALM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0151.HK vs. CALM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0151.HK drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CALM drawdown of -63.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0151.HK and CALM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0151.HKCALMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-63.31%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.80%

-36.88%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-37.27%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.71%

-37.27%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.71%

-39.68%

-14.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.57%

-22.56%

-36.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

-21.41%

-10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.65%

25.40%

-2.75%

Volatility

0151.HK vs. CALM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Want Want China (0151.HK) is 7.91%, while Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that 0151.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0151.HKCALMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

13.26%

-5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

22.89%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.43%

30.05%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.16%

33.08%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.07%

31.34%

-2.27%

Dividends

0151.HK vs. CALM - Dividend Comparison

0151.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than CALM's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0151.HK
Want Want China
4.71%3.43%5.64%3.49%9.28%2.49%5.76%3.80%3.83%2.56%2.86%2.44%
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
5.47%10.90%2.82%7.51%3.17%0.09%0.00%0.98%1.03%0.00%2.70%4.10%

Financials

0151.HK vs. CALM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Want Want China and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0151.HK values in HKD, CALM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0151.HK and CALM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0151.HK and CALM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer