0151.HK vs. CRRFY

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

0151.HK (Want Want China) and CRRFY (Carrefour SA PK) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — 0151.HK in Packaged Foods, CRRFY in Grocery Stores. Over the past 10 years, 0151.HK returned 0.37%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for CRRFY. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Want Want China (0151.HK) and Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

0151.HK is traded in HKD, while CRRFY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRRFY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0151.HK achieves a -27.16% return, which is significantly lower than CRRFY's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, 0151.HK has underperformed CRRFY with an annualized return of 0.37%, while CRRFY has yielded a comparatively higher 1.32% annualized return.

0151.HK

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 4.32%
• 6M: -28.39%
• YTD: -27.16%
• 1Y: -38.10%
• 3Y*: -11.53%
• 5Y*: -4.03%
• 10Y*: 0.37%
• ALL TIME*: 4.35%

CRRFY

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.61%
• 6M: 19.02%
• YTD: 19.47%
• 1Y: 36.45%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 1.32%
• ALL TIME*: -0.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
0151.HK Want Want China	HK$56.84M	HK$52.31M	HK$43.61M
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	HK$6.92M	HK$6.71M	HK$9.48M

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0151.HK Want Want China	-27.16%	4.73%	2.17%	-6.74%	-20.57%	31.69%	-18.31%	38.82%	-13.51%	35.85%
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	19.47%	29.88%	-21.75%	16.49%	-6.98%	10.40%	5.38%	1.32%	-20.97%	-6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between 0151.HK and CRRFY is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008	0.06

Return for Risk

0151.HK vs. CRRFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

0151.HK

0151.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
0151.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
0151.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
0151.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
0151.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
0151.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CRRFY

CRRFY Risk / Return Rank: 85
CRRFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CRRFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CRRFY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CRRFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CRRFY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Want Want China (0151.HK) and Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	0151.HK	CRRFY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.39	1.54	-2.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	2.03	-3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.27	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	3.58	-4.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	9.18	-10.89

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0151.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the CRRFY Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0151.HK and CRRFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0151.HK drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum CRRFY drawdown of -67.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0151.HK and CRRFY.

Drawdown Indicators

	0151.HK	CRRFY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.42%	-67.00%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.80%	-10.48%	-36.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.80%	-34.08%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.71%	-37.35%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.71%	-46.52%	-7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.57%	-35.03%	-23.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-40.57%	+9.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.65%	4.08%	+18.57%

Volatility

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Volatility Comparison

Want Want China (0151.HK) and Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY) have volatilities of 7.91% and 8.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0151.HK	CRRFY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	8.07%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.33%	20.92%	+2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.43%	24.45%	+3.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.16%	26.37%	+1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.07%	27.49%	+1.58%

Dividends

0151.HK vs. CRRFY - Dividend Comparison

0151.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than CRRFY's 7.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0151.HK Want Want China	4.71%	3.43%	5.64%	3.49%	9.28%	2.49%	5.76%	3.80%	3.83%	2.56%	2.86%	2.44%
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	7.48%	7.23%	6.73%	3.24%	3.35%	3.20%	1.46%	3.17%	3.27%	3.62%	5.33%	2.62%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0151.HK and CRRFY in my portfolio?

0151.HK and CRRFY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.