^XNDX vs. QLD
^XNDX (NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index) is an index, while QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
Performance
^XNDX vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^XNDX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 29.58%
- 6M
- 26.13%
- 1Y
- 66.80%
- 3Y*
- 43.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.41%
- 10Y*
- 36.27%
^XNDX vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^XNDX NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index | -0.07% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -6.61% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^XNDX vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
^XNDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLD
^XNDX vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index (^XNDX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^XNDX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^XNDX vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^XNDX drawdown since its inception was -0.07%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XNDX and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^XNDX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -83.13% | +83.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -9.26% | +9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -18.14% | +18.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.40% | — |
Volatility
^XNDX vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^XNDX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 35.77% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 45.34% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 44.80% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^XNDX and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer