^XNDX vs. SCHG
^XNDX (NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index) is an index, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
Performance
^XNDX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^XNDX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
^XNDX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^XNDX NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index | -0.37% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -0.12% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^XNDX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
^XNDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHG
^XNDX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Total Return Index (^XNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^XNDX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^XNDX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^XNDX drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XNDX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^XNDX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -34.59% | +34.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -6.57% | +6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -5.20% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility
^XNDX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^XNDX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.21% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.38% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.58% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^XNDX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer