PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XAX vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XAX achieves a 27.43% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XAX has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 14.18%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.68% annualized return.


^XAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
27.43%
6M
19.70%
1Y
63.31%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
21.64%
10Y*
14.18%

ONEQ

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.21%
YTD
16.16%
6M
15.18%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XAX
NYSE American Composite Index
27.43%46.53%2.00%11.10%20.66%45.17%-7.51%11.36%-13.87%15.31%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
16.16%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XAX and ONEQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between ^XAX and ONEQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XAX vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XAX
^XAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
^XAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^XAXONEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.07

2.48

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

3.26

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.66

3.15

+3.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.63

12.46

+10.17

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XAX and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^XAXONEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.48

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.70

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.91

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.65

-0.14

Drawdowns

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XAX drawdown since its inception was -54.41%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XAX and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XAXONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-55.09%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-12.64%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-24.09%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-35.23%

+15.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.59%

-35.23%

-17.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-0.85%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-7.95%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.19%

-0.38%

Volatility

^XAX vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 4.20%. This indicates that ^XAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XAXONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

4.20%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.08%

11.96%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

16.05%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

22.14%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

21.71%

+0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


^XAX and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^XAX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to ONEQ (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XAX dropped -54.41% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

^XAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XAX and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer