PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XAX vs. DFAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XAX vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^XAX vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
^XAX
NYSE American Composite Index
28.53%46.53%2.00%11.10%20.66%3.52%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
-1.60%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%9.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XAX achieves a 28.53% return, which is significantly higher than DFAC's -1.60% return.


^XAX

1D
2.13%
1M
0.74%
YTD
28.53%
6M
26.32%
1Y
72.84%
3Y*
27.34%
5Y*
26.04%
10Y*
14.73%

DFAC

1D
2.78%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
1.24%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XAX vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XAX
^XAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
^XAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XAX vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^XAXDFACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.13

1.03

+2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

1.56

+2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.23

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

1.54

+3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.61

7.28

+13.34

^XAX vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XAX and DFAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^XAXDFACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

1.03

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between ^XAX and DFAC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^XAX vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XAX drawdown since its inception was -54.41%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XAX and DFAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^XAXDFACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-23.12%

-31.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

-12.79%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-5.94%

+5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-5.62%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.71%

+0.90%

Volatility

^XAX vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

NYSE American Composite Index (^XAX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) at 5.31%. This indicates that ^XAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^XAXDFACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

5.31%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

9.59%

+7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.40%

18.51%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.30%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

17.30%

+4.46%