PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^VXN vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^VXN achieves a 65.49% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ^VXN has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 2.67%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.


^VXN

1D
16.99%
1M
41.85%
YTD
65.49%
6M
85.29%
1Y
53.05%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
2.67%

^IXIC

1D
-2.21%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
10.09%
6M
8.60%
1Y
30.34%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^VXN
CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index
65.49%-1.81%22.96%-41.30%30.19%-21.28%59.44%-46.28%100.51%-6.00%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
10.09%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ^VXN and ^IXIC is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2001

-0.72

The correlation between ^VXN and ^IXIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^VXN vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^VXN
^VXN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
^VXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^VXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
^VXN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
^VXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
^VXN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^VXN^IXICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.31

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

8.65

-6.44

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^VXN Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^VXN and ^IXIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^VXN drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^VXN and ^IXIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^VXN^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

-77.93%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.43%

-13.21%

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.32%

-24.32%

-37.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.20%

-36.40%

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.03%

-36.40%

-46.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.76%

-5.56%

-55.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.39%

-21.38%

-48.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.10%

3.51%

+20.59%

Volatility

^VXN vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) has a higher volatility of 41.32% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 7.66%. This indicates that ^VXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^VXN^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.32%

7.66%

+33.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.01%

13.86%

+64.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.48%

17.59%

+85.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.21%

22.65%

+71.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.58%

22.08%

+84.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


^VXN and ^IXIC have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^VXN has higher volatility (41.32%) compared to ^IXIC (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^VXN dropped -87.50% vs ^IXIC's -77.93%.

^IXIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^VXN and ^IXIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer