PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^VXN vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^VXN
CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index
40.90%-1.81%22.96%-41.30%30.19%-21.28%59.44%-46.28%100.51%-6.00%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
-4.87%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^VXN achieves a 40.90% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's -4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ^VXN has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 5.69%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


^VXN

1D
-2.41%
1M
8.50%
YTD
40.90%
6M
38.70%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
5.69%

^NDX

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^VXN vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^VXN
^VXN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
^VXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^VXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
^VXN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
^VXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^VXN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^VXN^NDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.04

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

1.62

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.93

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.18

7.05

-6.87

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^VXN Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^VXN and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^VXN^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.04

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.56

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.81

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.55

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between ^VXN and ^NDX is -0.70. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^VXN drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, which is greater than ^NDX's maximum drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^VXN and ^NDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^VXN^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

-82.90%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.32%

-12.72%

-48.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.97%

-35.56%

-37.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.01%

-35.56%

-50.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.59%

-8.04%

-58.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.39%

-24.72%

-44.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.21%

3.49%

+44.72%

Volatility

^VXN vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) has a higher volatility of 42.08% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 6.65%. This indicates that ^VXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^VXN^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.08%

6.65%

+35.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.84%

12.93%

+67.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.87%

22.77%

+88.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.26%

22.61%

+75.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.85%

22.48%

+86.37%