PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRK-A vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRK-A achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BRK-A has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 12.93%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.97% annualized return.


BRK-A

1D
0.66%
1M
2.64%
YTD
-4.82%
6M
-4.81%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.93%

MSFT

1D
0.17%
1M
4.28%
YTD
-11.10%
6M
-10.58%
1Y
-6.98%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
24.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.82%10.85%25.49%15.77%4.00%29.57%2.42%10.98%2.82%21.91%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.10%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BRK-A and MSFT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1986

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between BRK-A and MSFT has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRK-A:

$1549.77T

MSFT:

$3.19T

EPS

BRK-A:

$33.58

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

BRK-A:

21.39K

MSFT:

25.50

PEG Ratio

BRK-A:

830.29

MSFT:

1.78

PS Ratio

BRK-A:

4.13K

MSFT:

10.03

PB Ratio

BRK-A:

2.13K

MSFT:

7.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRK-A:

$375.39B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRK-A:

$89.84B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRK-A:

$71.10B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRK-A vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRK-A
BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRK-AMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.21

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-0.44

-0.16

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRK-A Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRK-A and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRK-AMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

-0.28

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.46

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.93

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.75

+0.08

Drawdowns

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRK-A drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-A and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRK-AMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-69.38%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-33.91%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-33.91%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.98%

-37.15%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.43%

-37.15%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.23%

-20.53%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-21.78%

+12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

16.00%

-11.61%

Volatility

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) is 3.58%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that BRK-A experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRK-AMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

9.93%

-6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

22.32%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

25.12%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

26.61%

-9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

27.03%

-8.06%

Dividends

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

BRK-A has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B90.00B20222023202420252026
93.68B
82.89B
(BRK-A) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BRK-A vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
24.0%
67.6%
Portfolio components
BRK-A - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.46B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

BRK-A - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 12.14B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

BRK-A - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.11B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BRK-A and MSFT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to BRK-A (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-A dropped -51.47% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

BRK-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRK-A and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer