PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Aggressive Target Experiment 1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Aggressive Target Experiment 1

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Aggressive Target Experiment 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every week.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
Aggressive Target Experiment 1
1.12%0.84%18.63%18.50%48.41%67.17%37.58%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
-0.91%-10.14%10.62%6.58%54.87%67.17%55.09%40.96%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
-0.33%-18.59%18.03%17.09%31.97%31.02%22.58%17.84%
GL
Globe Life Inc.
1.01%7.56%19.75%20.09%40.40%16.00%10.80%11.72%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.03%-2.83%29.23%33.60%54.95%79.69%50.00%33.28%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
0.07%-1.24%-32.12%-35.31%-17.31%14.74%4.03%14.97%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-1.14%-7.68%-14.31%-15.60%-33.72%22.62%10.45%23.92%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.16%-8.83%10.16%17.38%44.72%71.13%63.13%67.95%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-2.36%-4.48%-27.99%-30.28%-6.85%99.99%39.00%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
1.95%-2.80%15.93%22.12%3.53%31.18%18.78%11.71%
RTX
RTX Corporation
-0.37%7.66%0.82%3.50%27.98%25.18%18.20%15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 30, 2020, Aggressive Target Experiment 1's average daily return is +0.16%, while the average monthly return is +3.33%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.8 years.

Historically, 71% of months were positive and 29% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +33.2%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -9.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 2 months.

On a daily basis, Aggressive Target Experiment 1 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +8.5%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -7.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.88%9.68%-4.03%6.15%5.71%-4.23%18.63%
202510.06%7.03%-4.01%8.13%12.02%9.06%4.91%1.08%9.68%0.37%0.23%0.57%75.79%
20243.48%16.30%2.06%-3.51%9.92%2.01%4.92%5.97%10.50%3.33%16.25%-3.27%89.69%
202310.72%-1.52%3.38%-2.91%5.36%7.32%3.69%-3.42%-2.23%0.58%15.02%2.74%44.01%
2022-5.49%0.67%-0.44%-6.40%3.00%-5.74%8.27%-7.82%-9.63%11.30%4.82%-2.13%-11.35%
20214.51%2.07%4.76%5.85%1.27%1.51%-3.04%1.81%-3.72%3.17%-4.48%4.87%19.46%

Benchmark Metrics

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 has an annualized alpha of 28.50%, beta of 0.97, and R2 of 0.61 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 30, 2020.

  • This portfolio captured 165.10% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 45.89% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 28.50% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.97 and R2 of 0.61, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
28.50%
Beta
0.97
0.61
Upside Capture
165.10%
Downside Capture
45.89%

Expense Ratio

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 ranks 90 for risk / return — in the top 90% of Portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aggressive Target Experiment 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.89

1.86

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.86

2.53

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.26

2.53

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.50

11.37

+9.13


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
73
1.111.691.221.774.11
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
73
1.161.631.231.295.70
GL
Globe Life Inc.
86
1.852.621.333.638.38
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
85
1.752.511.303.469.77
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
20
-0.57-0.620.91-0.43-1.09
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
8
-1.03-1.460.81-0.78-1.35
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
74
1.201.751.212.074.94
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
37
-0.110.201.03-0.14-0.25
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
44
0.130.371.050.180.34
RTX
RTX Corporation
76
1.342.021.251.684.55

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Aggressive Target Experiment 1 Sharpe ratio is 2.89 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Aggressive Target Experiment 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 provided a 1.41% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.41%1.45%1.95%2.61%2.83%2.61%3.11%2.63%3.08%2.43%10.80%2.85%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
0.98%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
GL
Globe Life Inc.
0.68%0.75%0.85%0.73%0.68%0.83%0.77%0.64%0.85%0.65%0.75%0.71%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.36%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.13%3.52%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%
RTX
RTX Corporation
1.51%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Aggressive Target Experiment 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Aggressive Target Experiment 1 was 25.18%, occurring on Sep 30, 2022. Recovery took 168 trading sessions.

The current Aggressive Target Experiment 1 drawdown is 4.23%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-25.18%Sep 2022
10mo 26d8mo 5d
1y 6moNov 2021 - Jun 2023
2025 selloff2025
-18.55%Apr 2025
1mo 14d28d
2mo 12dFeb 2025 - May 2025
2023 pullback2023
-8.14%Sep 2023
1mo 26d1mo 7d
3mo 3dAug 2023 - Nov 2023
2026 pullback2026
-7.72%Mar 2026
25d16d
1mo 11dMar 2026 - Apr 2026
2021 pullback2021
-7.69%Jul 2021
1mo 5d3mo 19d
4mo 24dJun 2021 - Nov 2021

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 14 assets, with an effective number of assets of 8.31, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.21

1.97

1.79

1.82

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.82, placing it in the top 5% across portfolios — assets in this portfolio move largely independently, providing strong diversification benefit.

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Aggressive Target Experiment 1 has a 0.63 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.74


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AVGO has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.69, while CBOE has the lowest at 0.15.

CBOE
0.15
T
0.21
PM
0.25
LDOS
0.37
RTX
0.42
VST
0.42
GL
0.45
NFLX
0.50
PLTR
0.52
TPR
0.54
HWM
0.56
STX
0.56
NVDA
0.67
AVGO
0.69

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Aggressive Target Experiment 1. PLTR has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.69, while CBOE has the lowest at 0.20.

CBOE
0.20
PM
0.24
LDOS
0.38
T
0.39
NFLX
0.41
GL
0.44
RTX
0.48
NVDA
0.49
VST
0.50
AVGO
0.52
STX
0.60
TPR
0.65
HWM
0.67
PLTR
0.69

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 30, 2020
Diversification Analysis

Find what Aggressive Target Experiment 1 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Aggressive Target Experiment 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification