Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | Communication Services | 18.84% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | Industrials | 15.25% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | Technology | 12.43% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 12.08% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | Financial Services | 11.20% |
STX Seagate Technology plc | Technology | 10.40% |
VST Vistra Corp. | Utilities | 6.26% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | Technology | 4.65% |
RTX RTX Corporation | Industrials | 2.79% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | Communication Services | 2.66% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | Consumer Defensive | 2.21% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | Technology | 1.06% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 0.08% |
GL Globe Life Inc. | Financial Services | 0.08% |
Find the right asset allocation for Aggressive Target Experiment 1
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Aggressive Target Experiment 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every week.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | 0.31% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio Aggressive Target Experiment 1 | 1.12% | 0.84% | 18.63% | 18.50% | 48.41% | 67.17% | 37.58% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | -0.91% | -10.14% | 10.62% | 6.58% | 54.87% | 67.17% | 55.09% | 40.96% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | -0.33% | -18.59% | 18.03% | 17.09% | 31.97% | 31.02% | 22.58% | 17.84% |
GL Globe Life Inc. | 1.01% | 7.56% | 19.75% | 20.09% | 40.40% | 16.00% | 10.80% | 11.72% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.03% | -2.83% | 29.23% | 33.60% | 54.95% | 79.69% | 50.00% | 33.28% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 0.07% | -1.24% | -32.12% | -35.31% | -17.31% | 14.74% | 4.03% | 14.97% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -1.14% | -7.68% | -14.31% | -15.60% | -33.72% | 22.62% | 10.45% | 23.92% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.16% | -8.83% | 10.16% | 17.38% | 44.72% | 71.13% | 63.13% | 67.95% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -2.36% | -4.48% | -27.99% | -30.28% | -6.85% | 99.99% | 39.00% | — |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 1.95% | -2.80% | 15.93% | 22.12% | 3.53% | 31.18% | 18.78% | 11.71% |
RTX RTX Corporation | -0.37% | 7.66% | 0.82% | 3.50% | 27.98% | 25.18% | 18.20% | 15.68% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 30, 2020, Aggressive Target Experiment 1's average daily return is +0.16%, while the average monthly return is +3.33%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.8 years.
Historically, 71% of months were positive and 29% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +33.2%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -9.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 2 months.
On a daily basis, Aggressive Target Experiment 1 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +8.5%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -7.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.88% | 9.68% | -4.03% | 6.15% | 5.71% | -4.23% | 18.63% | ||||||
| 2025 | 10.06% | 7.03% | -4.01% | 8.13% | 12.02% | 9.06% | 4.91% | 1.08% | 9.68% | 0.37% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 75.79% |
| 2024 | 3.48% | 16.30% | 2.06% | -3.51% | 9.92% | 2.01% | 4.92% | 5.97% | 10.50% | 3.33% | 16.25% | -3.27% | 89.69% |
| 2023 | 10.72% | -1.52% | 3.38% | -2.91% | 5.36% | 7.32% | 3.69% | -3.42% | -2.23% | 0.58% | 15.02% | 2.74% | 44.01% |
| 2022 | -5.49% | 0.67% | -0.44% | -6.40% | 3.00% | -5.74% | 8.27% | -7.82% | -9.63% | 11.30% | 4.82% | -2.13% | -11.35% |
| 2021 | 4.51% | 2.07% | 4.76% | 5.85% | 1.27% | 1.51% | -3.04% | 1.81% | -3.72% | 3.17% | -4.48% | 4.87% | 19.46% |
Benchmark Metrics
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 has an annualized alpha of 28.50%, beta of 0.97, and R2 of 0.61 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 30, 2020.
- This portfolio captured 165.10% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 45.89% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 28.50% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 0.97 and R2 of 0.61, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 28.50%
- Beta
- 0.97
- R²
- 0.61
- Upside Capture
- 165.10%
- Downside Capture
- 45.89%
Expense Ratio
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 ranks 90 for risk / return — in the top 90% of Portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aggressive Target Experiment 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.89 | 1.86 | +1.03 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.86 | 2.53 | +1.33 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.26 | 2.53 | +3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.50 | 11.37 | +9.13 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 73 | 1.11 | 1.69 | 1.22 | 1.77 | 4.11 |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 73 | 1.16 | 1.63 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 5.70 |
GL Globe Life Inc. | 86 | 1.85 | 2.62 | 1.33 | 3.63 | 8.38 |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 85 | 1.75 | 2.51 | 1.30 | 3.46 | 9.77 |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 20 | -0.57 | -0.62 | 0.91 | -0.43 | -1.09 |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 8 | -1.03 | -1.46 | 0.81 | -0.78 | -1.35 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 74 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 1.21 | 2.07 | 4.94 |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 37 | -0.11 | 0.20 | 1.03 | -0.14 | -0.25 |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 44 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 1.05 | 0.18 | 0.34 |
RTX RTX Corporation | 76 | 1.34 | 2.02 | 1.25 | 1.68 | 4.55 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 provided a 1.41% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 1.41% | 1.45% | 1.95% | 2.61% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 3.08% | 2.43% | 10.80% | 2.85% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
GL Globe Life Inc. | 0.68% | 0.75% | 0.85% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.77% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 0.65% | 0.75% | 0.71% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.13% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
RTX RTX Corporation | 1.51% | 1.46% | 2.14% | 2.76% | 2.14% | 2.33% | 21.21% | 1.96% | 2.66% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Aggressive Target Experiment 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Aggressive Target Experiment 1 was 25.18%, occurring on Sep 30, 2022. Recovery took 168 trading sessions.
The current Aggressive Target Experiment 1 drawdown is 4.23%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bear market2022 | -25.18%Sep 2022 | 10mo 26d | 8mo 5d | 1y 6moNov 2021 - Jun 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -18.55%Apr 2025 | 1mo 14d | 28d | 2mo 12dFeb 2025 - May 2025 |
2023 pullback2023 | -8.14%Sep 2023 | 1mo 26d | 1mo 7d | 3mo 3dAug 2023 - Nov 2023 |
2026 pullback2026 | -7.72%Mar 2026 | 25d | 16d | 1mo 11dMar 2026 - Apr 2026 |
2021 pullback2021 | -7.69%Jul 2021 | 1mo 5d | 3mo 19d | 4mo 24dJun 2021 - Nov 2021 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 14 assets, with an effective number of assets of 8.31, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 2.21 | 1.97 | 1.79 | 1.82 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.82, placing it in the top 5% across portfolios — assets in this portfolio move largely independently, providing strong diversification benefit.
Aggressive Target Experiment 1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.74 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AVGO has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.69, while CBOE has the lowest at 0.15.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what Aggressive Target Experiment 1 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Aggressive Target Experiment 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification