PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Top Lobbying Spenders
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Top Lobbying Spenders

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Top Lobbying Spenders, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the Top Lobbying Spenders returned 5.38% Year-To-Date and 16.42% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
1.65%1.97%10.35%10.82%26.39%19.66%12.33%13.81%
Portfolio
Top Lobbying Spenders
0.25%2.86%5.38%6.42%22.28%16.68%12.82%16.42%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
-1.31%7.42%8.65%9.32%22.30%18.73%11.36%12.18%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.13%-6.86%6.59%10.55%15.99%25.16%7.58%21.42%
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
-2.16%-3.19%-7.33%-1.81%-19.31%-10.02%-11.19%1.10%
GM
General Motors Company
3.15%12.55%3.85%3.02%74.39%31.69%7.22%13.35%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
-0.32%12.38%5.44%6.68%38.81%37.10%39.92%33.49%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
-1.85%3.45%10.95%10.78%11.97%7.77%9.61%11.27%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.77%-3.29%-9.93%-8.18%-12.74%28.68%12.58%18.14%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
-2.79%3.90%10.76%16.28%46.78%4.85%11.88%11.34%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-1.02%1.19%-3.74%-4.67%7.07%7.70%9.67%11.55%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
-0.80%2.65%7.92%1.67%13.35%-7.86%-3.09%2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 18, 2012, Top Lobbying Spenders's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.54%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.8 years.

Historically, 69% of months were positive and 31% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +14.1%, while the worst month was Feb 2020 at -8.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Top Lobbying Spenders closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +8.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -9.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20269.54%1.87%-5.87%-0.96%3.23%-1.87%5.38%
20252.37%-0.07%-3.15%-2.26%0.83%3.50%1.70%2.66%1.34%1.50%6.53%1.93%17.84%
20244.34%5.14%3.79%-3.70%3.63%2.60%1.79%4.32%-0.07%-1.21%-0.58%-3.03%17.83%
20232.80%-1.43%4.92%3.21%0.74%6.24%1.15%1.78%-2.84%-0.74%4.53%3.67%26.34%
2022-3.63%-2.60%4.56%-6.35%4.94%-5.57%2.95%-2.49%-7.56%8.90%5.69%-3.55%-6.17%
20211.53%-1.05%6.65%3.66%1.63%3.73%1.13%0.84%-4.96%1.58%0.83%5.58%22.70%

Benchmark Metrics

Top Lobbying Spenders has an annualized alpha of 7.82%, beta of 0.82, and R2 of 0.72 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 18, 2012.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (99.85%) than losses (66.60%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 7.82% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
7.82%
Beta
0.82
0.72
Upside Capture
99.85%
Downside Capture
66.60%

Expense Ratio

Top Lobbying Spenders has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Top Lobbying Spenders ranks 31 for risk / return — below 31% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Top Lobbying Spenders Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Top Lobbying Spenders and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.56

2.14

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.38

2.89

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.91

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

13.08

-6.23


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
66
0.811.381.171.353.10
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
57
0.530.941.120.741.74
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
14
-0.66-0.770.90-0.71-1.34
GM
General Motors Company
90
2.143.131.414.6711.51
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
71
1.031.581.211.684.19
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
54
0.460.761.100.481.12
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
27
-0.36-0.290.96-0.38-0.79
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
86
1.722.591.314.1410.29
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
48
0.270.591.070.230.57
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
60
0.561.021.121.172.35

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Top Lobbying Spenders Sharpe ratio is 1.56 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.56 to 2.44, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Top Lobbying Spenders compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Top Lobbying Spenders provided a 3.12% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio3.12%2.32%2.24%2.00%1.68%1.69%1.87%1.99%2.27%2.05%2.29%2.15%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.80%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
12.10%4.35%3.25%2.60%3.03%1.95%1.72%1.40%2.69%1.18%1.96%1.73%
GM
General Motors Company
0.79%0.70%0.90%1.00%0.54%0.00%0.91%4.15%4.54%3.71%4.36%4.06%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.57%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.44%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.63%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.73%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.62%6.91%6.33%5.70%3.12%2.64%3.92%3.68%3.12%3.53%3.69%3.47%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Top Lobbying Spenders. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Top Lobbying Spenders was 26.59%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 53 trading sessions.

The current Top Lobbying Spenders drawdown is 6.04%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-26.59%Mar 2020
2mo 6d2mo 17d
4mo 23dJan 2020 - Jun 2020
Bear market2022
-16.51%Sep 2022
8mo 21d6mo 7d
1y 2moJan 2022 - Apr 2023
2025 selloff2025
-16.34%Apr 2025
5mo 25d5mo 26d
11mo 21dOct 2024 - Oct 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-14.51%Dec 2018
2mo 23d1mo 13d
4mo 6dOct 2018 - Feb 2019
2016 correction2016
-12.23%Feb 2016
2mo 11d2mo 9d
4mo 20dDec 2015 - Apr 2016

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 10.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.09

2.00

1.90

1.69

1.67

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.67, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Top Lobbying Spenders correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Top Lobbying Spenders has a 0.50 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.78


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AMZN has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.64, while MRK has the lowest at 0.37.

MRK
0.37
NOC
0.38
LMT
0.40
LLY
0.41
PFE
0.42
AMGN
0.48
CMCSA
0.53
GM
0.55
META
0.56
AMZN
0.64

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Top Lobbying Spenders. AMGN has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.63, while NOC has the lowest at 0.52.

NOC
0.52
LMT
0.53
GM
0.55
MRK
0.57
CMCSA
0.58
LLY
0.58
META
0.58
AMZN
0.58
PFE
0.59
AMGN
0.63

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 18, 2012
Diversification Analysis

Find what Top Lobbying Spenders is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Top Lobbying Spenders is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification