Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | Communication Services | 10% |
GM General Motors Company | Consumer Cyclical | 10% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | Industrials | 10% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | Consumer Cyclical | 10% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | Industrials | 10% |
AMGN Amgen Inc. | Healthcare | 10% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | Healthcare | 10% |
PFE Pfizer Inc. | Healthcare | 10% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | Healthcare | 10% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | Communication Services | 10% |
Find the right asset allocation for Top Lobbying Spenders
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Top Lobbying Spenders, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 13, 2026, the Top Lobbying Spenders returned 5.38% Year-To-Date and 16.42% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 1.65% | 1.97% | 10.35% | 10.82% | 26.39% | 19.66% | 12.33% | 13.81% |
Portfolio Top Lobbying Spenders | 0.25% | 2.86% | 5.38% | 6.42% | 22.28% | 16.68% | 12.82% | 16.42% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AMGN Amgen Inc. | -1.31% | 7.42% | 8.65% | 9.32% | 22.30% | 18.73% | 11.36% | 12.18% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.13% | -6.86% | 6.59% | 10.55% | 15.99% | 25.16% | 7.58% | 21.42% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | -2.16% | -3.19% | -7.33% | -1.81% | -19.31% | -10.02% | -11.19% | 1.10% |
GM General Motors Company | 3.15% | 12.55% | 3.85% | 3.02% | 74.39% | 31.69% | 7.22% | 13.35% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | -0.32% | 12.38% | 5.44% | 6.68% | 38.81% | 37.10% | 39.92% | 33.49% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | -1.85% | 3.45% | 10.95% | 10.78% | 11.97% | 7.77% | 9.61% | 11.27% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 4.77% | -3.29% | -9.93% | -8.18% | -12.74% | 28.68% | 12.58% | 18.14% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | -2.79% | 3.90% | 10.76% | 16.28% | 46.78% | 4.85% | 11.88% | 11.34% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | -1.02% | 1.19% | -3.74% | -4.67% | 7.07% | 7.70% | 9.67% | 11.55% |
PFE Pfizer Inc. | -0.80% | 2.65% | 7.92% | 1.67% | 13.35% | -7.86% | -3.09% | 2.26% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 18, 2012, Top Lobbying Spenders's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.54%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.8 years.
Historically, 69% of months were positive and 31% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +14.1%, while the worst month was Feb 2020 at -8.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, Top Lobbying Spenders closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +8.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -9.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 9.54% | 1.87% | -5.87% | -0.96% | 3.23% | -1.87% | 5.38% | ||||||
| 2025 | 2.37% | -0.07% | -3.15% | -2.26% | 0.83% | 3.50% | 1.70% | 2.66% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 6.53% | 1.93% | 17.84% |
| 2024 | 4.34% | 5.14% | 3.79% | -3.70% | 3.63% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 4.32% | -0.07% | -1.21% | -0.58% | -3.03% | 17.83% |
| 2023 | 2.80% | -1.43% | 4.92% | 3.21% | 0.74% | 6.24% | 1.15% | 1.78% | -2.84% | -0.74% | 4.53% | 3.67% | 26.34% |
| 2022 | -3.63% | -2.60% | 4.56% | -6.35% | 4.94% | -5.57% | 2.95% | -2.49% | -7.56% | 8.90% | 5.69% | -3.55% | -6.17% |
| 2021 | 1.53% | -1.05% | 6.65% | 3.66% | 1.63% | 3.73% | 1.13% | 0.84% | -4.96% | 1.58% | 0.83% | 5.58% | 22.70% |
Benchmark Metrics
Top Lobbying Spenders has an annualized alpha of 7.82%, beta of 0.82, and R2 of 0.72 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 18, 2012.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (99.85%) than losses (66.60%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 7.82% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 7.82%
- Beta
- 0.82
- R²
- 0.72
- Upside Capture
- 99.85%
- Downside Capture
- 66.60%
Expense Ratio
Top Lobbying Spenders has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Top Lobbying Spenders ranks 31 for risk / return — below 31% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Top Lobbying Spenders and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.14 | -0.57 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 2.89 | -0.51 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.91 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 13.08 | -6.23 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMGN Amgen Inc. | 66 | 0.81 | 1.38 | 1.17 | 1.35 | 3.10 |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 57 | 0.53 | 0.94 | 1.12 | 0.74 | 1.74 |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 14 | -0.66 | -0.77 | 0.90 | -0.71 | -1.34 |
GM General Motors Company | 90 | 2.14 | 3.13 | 1.41 | 4.67 | 11.51 |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 71 | 1.03 | 1.58 | 1.21 | 1.68 | 4.19 |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 54 | 0.46 | 0.76 | 1.10 | 0.48 | 1.12 |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 27 | -0.36 | -0.29 | 0.96 | -0.38 | -0.79 |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 86 | 1.72 | 2.59 | 1.31 | 4.14 | 10.29 |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 48 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 0.23 | 0.57 |
PFE Pfizer Inc. | 60 | 0.56 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 2.35 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Top Lobbying Spenders provided a 3.12% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 3.12% | 2.32% | 2.24% | 2.00% | 1.68% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.05% | 2.29% | 2.15% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AMGN Amgen Inc. | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.45% | 2.96% | 2.95% | 3.13% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.65% | 2.74% | 1.95% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 12.10% | 4.35% | 3.25% | 2.60% | 3.03% | 1.95% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 2.69% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 1.73% |
GM General Motors Company | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 4.15% | 4.54% | 3.71% | 4.36% | 4.06% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.57% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.44% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3.63% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.73% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
PFE Pfizer Inc. | 6.62% | 6.91% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 3.92% | 3.68% | 3.12% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 3.47% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Top Lobbying Spenders. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Top Lobbying Spenders was 26.59%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 53 trading sessions.
The current Top Lobbying Spenders drawdown is 6.04%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COVID crash2020 | -26.59%Mar 2020 | 2mo 6d | 2mo 17d | 4mo 23dJan 2020 - Jun 2020 |
Bear market2022 | -16.51%Sep 2022 | 8mo 21d | 6mo 7d | 1y 2moJan 2022 - Apr 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -16.34%Apr 2025 | 5mo 25d | 5mo 26d | 11mo 21dOct 2024 - Oct 2025 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -14.51%Dec 2018 | 2mo 23d | 1mo 13d | 4mo 6dOct 2018 - Feb 2019 |
2016 correction2016 | -12.23%Feb 2016 | 2mo 11d | 2mo 9d | 4mo 20dDec 2015 - Apr 2016 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 10.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 2.09 | 2.00 | 1.90 | 1.69 | 1.67 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.67, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
Top Lobbying Spenders correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.78 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AMZN has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.64, while MRK has the lowest at 0.37.
Asset Correlations Table
| META | GM | NOC | AMZN | LMT | LLY | CMCSA | MRK | PFE | AMGN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| GM | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| NOC | 0.13 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| AMZN | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.28 |
| LMT | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.75 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| LLY | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| CMCSA | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.37 |
| MRK | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.49 |
| PFE | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
| AMGN | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 1.00 |
Find what Top Lobbying Spenders is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Top Lobbying Spenders is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification