PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. AMGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOC vs. AMGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than AMGN's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has underperformed AMGN with an annualized return of 11.55%, while AMGN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


NOC

1D
-1.02%
1M
1.19%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-4.67%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
11.55%

AMGN

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.42%
YTD
8.65%
6M
9.32%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. AMGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-3.74%23.61%1.93%-12.79%43.02%29.29%-9.92%42.69%-18.95%33.88%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
8.65%29.67%-6.77%13.46%20.43%0.87%-1.99%27.60%15.23%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and AMGN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOC:

$77.62B

AMGN:

$190.69B

EPS

NOC:

$31.95

AMGN:

$14.38

PE Ratio

NOC:

17.05

AMGN:

24.38

PEG Ratio

NOC:

2.51

AMGN:

1.40

PS Ratio

NOC:

1.84

AMGN:

5.11

PB Ratio

NOC:

4.54

AMGN:

20.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOC:

$42.37B

AMGN:

$37.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOC:

$8.69B

AMGN:

$26.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOC:

$7.50B

AMGN:

$17.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOC vs. AMGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. AMGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOCAMGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.35

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

3.10

-2.53

NOC vs. AMGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the AMGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and AMGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOC vs. AMGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than AMGN's maximum drawdown of -63.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and AMGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCAMGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-63.48%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-16.57%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.20%

-22.74%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.20%

-24.86%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

-24.86%

-11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.76%

-9.01%

-19.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-16.77%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.38%

7.20%

+5.18%

Volatility

NOC vs. AMGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 7.45%, while Amgen Inc. (AMGN) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCAMGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

8.08%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.26%

19.27%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.28%

27.81%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.29%

23.98%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

24.87%

+0.56%

Dividends

NOC vs. AMGN - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than AMGN's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.80%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.73%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%

Financials

NOC vs. AMGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Amgen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
9.88B
8.62B
(NOC) Total Revenue
(AMGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOC vs. AMGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Amgen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
19.8%
68.2%
Portfolio components
NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

AMGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.87B and revenue of 8.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 989.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

AMGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 875.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

AMGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOC and AMGN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMGN has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to NOC (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs AMGN's -63.48%.

AMGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOC and AMGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer