PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund (ZZZD.TO) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZZZD.TO is traded in CAD, while CCEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CCEF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZZZD.TO achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly higher than CCEF's 9.78% return.


ZZZD.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
0.47%
6M
9.44%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*

CCEF

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.01%
6M
5.89%
YTD
9.78%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZZZD.TO
BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund
11.41%10.01%3.23%
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
9.78%8.29%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ZZZD.TO and CCEF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZZZD.TO
ZZZD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ZZZD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZZZD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZZZD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ZZZD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZZZD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund (ZZZD.TO) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZZZD.TOCCEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

2.47

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.85

9.34

+9.51

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZZZD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZZZD.TO and CCEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZZZD.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.28%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZZZD.TO and CCEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZZZD.TOCCEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.28%

-14.99%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-6.54%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.49%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-1.92%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.73%

-0.90%

Volatility

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund (ZZZD.TO) is 2.34%, while Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that ZZZD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZZZD.TOCCEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

2.52%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

7.56%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

8.94%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

11.50%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

11.50%

+1.13%

Dividends

ZZZD.TO vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

ZZZD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than CCEF's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
7.96%8.08%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZZZD.TO
BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund
3.72%4.07%4.29%4.28%4.51%4.27%4.09%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZZZD.TO and CCEF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Calamos.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZZZD.TO and CCEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer