PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWI vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AWI vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWI achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 36.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AWI has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 15.98%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.65% annualized return.


AWI

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-16.78%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
31.76%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
15.98%

HWM

1D
0.97%
1M
9.28%
YTD
36.89%
6M
34.81%
1Y
62.11%
3Y*
82.73%
5Y*
53.11%
10Y*
33.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWI vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
-17.59%36.23%45.05%45.37%-40.26%57.44%-19.97%62.79%-3.61%44.86%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
36.89%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AWI and HWM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2006

0.43

The correlation between AWI and HWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AWI:

$6.78B

HWM:

$112.99B

EPS

AWI:

$7.04

HWM:

$4.31

PE Ratio

AWI:

22.28

HWM:

65.07

PEG Ratio

AWI:

1.34

HWM:

1.10

PS Ratio

AWI:

4.14

HWM:

13.16

PB Ratio

AWI:

7.59

HWM:

20.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

AWI:

$1.65B

HWM:

$8.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AWI:

$664.10M

HWM:

$2.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

AWI:

$578.40M

HWM:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWI vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWI
AWI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWI vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWIHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.32

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

3.93

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

11.10

-10.77

AWI vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWI Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWI and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWI vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWI drawdown since its inception was -80.98%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWI and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWIHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.98%

-88.30%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.91%

-15.89%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.91%

-19.41%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.06%

-21.22%

-24.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.44%

-64.81%

+18.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.56%

-1.01%

-21.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-31.00%

+12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

5.61%

+5.94%

Volatility

AWI vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) is 7.47%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that AWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWIHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

10.24%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

25.16%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.02%

31.74%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.24%

32.21%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

39.83%

-9.85%

Dividends

AWI vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

AWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than HWM's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
0.84%0.66%0.81%1.06%1.38%0.74%1.09%0.77%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

AWI vs. HWM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
409.90M
2.31B
(AWI) Total Revenue
(HWM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AWI vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
37.9%
36.9%
Portfolio components
AWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.30M and revenue of 409.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

AWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 94.20M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

AWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 66.80M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AWI and HWM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWM has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to AWI (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWI dropped -80.98% vs HWM's -88.30%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWI and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer