ZTS vs. SMH
ZTS (Zoetis Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, ZTS returned 5.12%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for SMH. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZTS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -37.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 5.12%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.
ZTS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- -37.59%
- YTD
- -37.76%
- 1Y
- -46.68%
- 3Y*
- -23.39%
- 5Y*
- -16.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.78%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 1Y
- 92.69%
- 3Y*
- 53.04%
- 5Y*
- 32.99%
- 10Y*
- 33.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.29B | $7.23B | $7.12B | |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | $387.99M | $418.24M | $600.61M |
ZTS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | -37.76% | -21.75% | -16.63% | 35.91% | -39.51% | 48.26% | 25.76% | 55.71% | 19.45% | 35.55% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 51.46% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTS and SMH is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2013 | 0.36 |
The correlation between ZTS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
ZTS
SMH
ZTS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZTS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.37 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 3.79 | -4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 15.18 | -16.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZTS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.48% | -84.96% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.60% | -24.62% | -28.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.99% | -35.74% | -27.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.48% | -45.30% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.48% | -45.30% | -24.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.02% | -18.46% | -48.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -40.89% | +25.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.08% | 6.13% | +22.95% |
Volatility
ZTS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is 6.22%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that ZTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 14.15% | -7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.16% | 32.94% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.31% | 38.50% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.03% | 36.51% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 33.33% | -6.14% |
Dividends
ZTS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 2.71% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTS and SMH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to ZTS (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTS dropped -69.48% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZTS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer