ZTS vs. CAH
Compare and contrast key facts about Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZTS or CAH.
Correlation
The correlation between ZTS and CAH is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ZTS vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ZTS:
-0.46
CAH:
1.03
ZTS:
-0.49
CAH:
1.52
ZTS:
0.94
CAH:
1.20
ZTS:
-0.29
CAH:
1.23
ZTS:
-0.94
CAH:
2.65
ZTS:
12.08%
CAH:
8.45%
ZTS:
25.05%
CAH:
21.70%
ZTS:
-46.52%
CAH:
-61.58%
ZTS:
-30.38%
CAH:
0.00%
Fundamentals
ZTS:
$75.58B
CAH:
$30.94B
ZTS:
$5.33
CAH:
$5.20
ZTS:
31.43
CAH:
24.58
ZTS:
2.58
CAH:
1.04
ZTS:
$6.94B
CAH:
$167.06B
ZTS:
$4.86B
CAH:
$5.59B
ZTS:
$3.02B
CAH:
$1.90B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 8.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has outperformed CAH with an annualized return of 15.13%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
ZTS
2.82%
1.63%
-6.38%
-11.71%
4.67%
15.13%
CAH
8.55%
8.54%
34.57%
23.62%
22.06%
7.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZTS vs. CAH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ZTS
CAH
ZTS vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZTS vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than CAH's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.67% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.79% | 4.24% | 2.99% | 2.41% | 1.68% | 1.65% |
Drawdowns
ZTS vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -46.52%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and CAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZTS vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 4.09%. This indicates that ZTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZTS vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoetis Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities