PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTS vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -40.62% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 4.92%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


ZTS

1D
-1.75%
1M
-6.91%
6M
-40.05%
YTD
-40.62%
1Y
-51.67%
3Y*
-23.59%
5Y*
-17.20%
10Y*
4.92%

^SP500TR

1D
0.38%
1M
1.60%
6M
8.96%
YTD
10.89%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
-40.62%-21.75%-16.63%35.91%-39.51%48.26%25.76%55.71%19.45%35.55%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
10.89%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTS and ^SP500TR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between ZTS and ^SP500TR has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTS
ZTS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ZTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTS^SP500TRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.67

1.32

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

2.46

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.95

10.80

-12.75

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTS Sharpe Ratio is -1.44, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTS and ^SP500TR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and ^SP500TR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTS^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.48%

-55.25%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.60%

-8.89%

-44.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.99%

-18.75%

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.48%

-24.49%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.48%

-33.79%

-35.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.54%

-0.74%

-67.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.16%

-8.15%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.55%

2.02%

+24.53%

Volatility

ZTS vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 3.62%. This indicates that ZTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTS^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

3.62%

+5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.93%

9.98%

+21.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.10%

12.55%

+23.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.97%

17.01%

+11.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

18.05%

+9.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTS and ^SP500TR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTS has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to ^SP500TR (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTS dropped -69.48% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.

^SP500TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTS and ^SP500TR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer