ZTS vs. EDEN.PA
ZTS (Zoetis Inc.) and EDEN.PA (Edenred SA) are both stocks. ZTS operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while EDEN.PA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ZTS returned 5.17%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for EDEN.PA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZTS is traded in USD, while EDEN.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EDEN.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -38.49% return, which is significantly lower than EDEN.PA's 47.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has underperformed EDEN.PA with an annualized return of 5.17%, while EDEN.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return.
ZTS
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -37.91%
- YTD
- -38.49%
- 1Y
- -47.74%
- 3Y*
- -24.37%
- 5Y*
- -16.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.71%
EDEN.PA
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 59.29%
- YTD
- 47.32%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- -18.55%
- 5Y*
- -8.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.25%
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | -38.49% | -21.75% | -16.63% | 35.91% | -39.51% | 48.26% | 25.76% | 55.71% | 19.45% | 35.55% |
EDEN.PA Edenred SA | 47.32% | -29.26% | -43.64% | 11.61% | 20.24% | -17.19% | 11.69% | 43.77% | 30.50% | 48.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTS and EDEN.PA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2013 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ZTS
EDEN.PA
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and Edenred SA (EDEN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZTS | EDEN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.08 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 0.16 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 0.28 | -2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, roughly equal to the maximum EDEN.PA drawdown of -71.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and EDEN.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTS | EDEN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.48% | -71.94% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.60% | -44.44% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.99% | -70.93% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.48% | -71.94% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.48% | -71.94% | +2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.41% | -48.26% | -19.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -18.32% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.30% | 25.39% | +1.91% |
Volatility
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is 8.82%, while Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that ZTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTS | EDEN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 11.12% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.11% | 35.21% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.29% | 47.19% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 34.72% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 31.81% | -4.63% |
Dividends
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Dividend Comparison
ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than EDEN.PA's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN.PA Edenred SA | 4.94% | 6.40% | 3.46% | 1.85% | 1.77% | 1.85% | 1.51% | 1.87% | 2.65% | 1.28% | 2.23% | 2.41% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 2.74% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Financials
ZTS vs. EDEN.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoetis Inc. and Edenred SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTS and EDEN.PA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZTS and EDEN.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer