EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI
EDEN.PA (Edenred SA) is a stock, while ^FCHI (CAC 40) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EDEN.PA returned 5.64%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for ^FCHI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN.PA achieves a 51.62% return, which is significantly higher than ^FCHI's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN.PA has underperformed ^FCHI with an annualized return of 5.64%, while ^FCHI has yielded a comparatively higher 6.77% annualized return.
EDEN.PA
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 62.54%
- YTD
- 51.62%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- -19.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.90%
^FCHI
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.25%
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN.PA Edenred SA | 51.62% | -37.63% | -39.93% | 8.19% | 27.92% | -11.14% | 2.60% | 46.62% | 36.89% | 30.11% |
^FCHI CAC 40 | 2.32% | 10.42% | -2.15% | 16.52% | -9.50% | 28.85% | -7.14% | 26.37% | -10.95% | 9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN.PA and ^FCHI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2010 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EDEN.PA and ^FCHI has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN.PA
^FCHI
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDEN.PA | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 1.69 | -1.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN.PA drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than ^FCHI's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN.PA and ^FCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN.PA | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -65.29% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -11.08% | -32.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.89% | -16.71% | -56.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.37% | -23.04% | -50.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.37% | -38.56% | -34.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.38% | -3.27% | -47.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -24.39% | +8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.97% | 3.89% | +21.08% |
Volatility
EDEN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Volatility Comparison
Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to CAC 40 (^FCHI) at 3.51%. This indicates that EDEN.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^FCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN.PA | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 3.51% | +7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.17% | 11.50% | +23.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 14.23% | +32.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 16.40% | +17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 17.39% | +13.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN.PA and ^FCHI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EDEN.PA and ^FCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer