PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDEN.PA achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly lower than SU.PA's 21.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN.PA has underperformed SU.PA with an annualized return of 5.14%, while SU.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.11% annualized return.


EDEN.PA

1D
-0.40%
1M
5.14%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.94%
1Y
-12.15%
3Y*
-26.08%
5Y*
-11.06%
10Y*
5.14%

SU.PA

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.26%
YTD
21.86%
6M
21.55%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
20.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDEN.PA
Edenred SA
19.04%-37.63%-39.93%8.19%27.92%-11.14%2.60%46.62%36.89%30.07%
SU.PA
Schneider Electric S.E.
21.86%-0.74%34.50%41.87%-22.44%48.65%33.52%58.05%-13.18%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDEN.PA and SU.PA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2010

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between EDEN.PA and SU.PA has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDEN.PA
EDEN.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDEN.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SU.PA
SU.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SU.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SU.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SU.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SU.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SU.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDEN.PASU.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

1.51

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

3.72

-4.21

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDEN.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the SU.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDEN.PA and SU.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDEN.PASU.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

0.85

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.63

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.72

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.27

-0.10

Drawdowns

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDEN.PA drawdown since its inception was -73.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SU.PA drawdown of -74.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN.PA and SU.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDEN.PASU.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.38%

-74.24%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.79%

-17.76%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.38%

-31.34%

-42.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.38%

-35.98%

-37.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.38%

-35.98%

-37.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.05%

-1.85%

-59.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-19.83%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.97%

7.25%

+17.72%

Volatility

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Edenred SA (EDEN.PA) is 7.43%, while Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that EDEN.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SU.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDEN.PASU.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

9.82%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.99%

24.14%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.43%

31.63%

+11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.34%

29.17%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.43%

27.45%

+2.98%

Dividends

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Dividend Comparison

EDEN.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than SU.PA's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDEN.PA
Edenred SA
5.38%6.40%3.46%1.85%1.77%1.85%1.51%1.87%2.65%1.28%2.23%2.41%
SU.PA
Schneider Electric S.E.
1.49%1.66%1.45%1.73%2.22%1.51%2.16%2.57%3.68%2.88%3.03%3.65%

Financials

EDEN.PA vs. SU.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Edenred SA and Schneider Electric S.E.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EDEN.PA and SU.PA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDEN.PA and SU.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer