PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. SPTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than SPTS's 0.41% return.


ZTRE

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.55%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.47%6.60%0.32%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.41%5.05%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and SPTS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.78

The correlation between ZTRE and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTRESPTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.70

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

14.46

-3.86

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and SPTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and SPTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTRESPTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-5.83%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-0.84%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.31%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-1.72%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.21%

+0.15%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) has a higher volatility of 0.59% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.46%. This indicates that ZTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTRESPTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.46%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

0.92%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

1.34%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.11%

1.99%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

1.71%

+0.40%

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than SPTS's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.22%4.37%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and SPTS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTRE has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to SPTS (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs SPTS's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, ZTRE leads with 3.84% vs 3.10% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZTRE has performed better with a 3.84% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZTRE.

ZTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. ZTRE tracks ICE 3-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPTS tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 0.03% for SPTS.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and SPTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer