PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


ZTRE

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZTRE vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTRERBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

3.76

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

6.07

-2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.00

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

7.98

-4.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.40

35.17

-21.77

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and RBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTRERBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

3.76

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.60

4.10

-1.50

Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and RBIL is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than RBIL's 4.42% yield.


Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and RBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTRERBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.50%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-0.50%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.08%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.06%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.11%

+0.23%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.58%. This indicates that ZTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZTRERBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.58%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.29%

0.67%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16%

1.04%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.12%

1.03%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.12%

1.03%

+1.09%