ZTRE vs. FCSH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ZTRE (F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. ZTRE is passively managed, while FCSH is actively managed. Over the past year, ZTRE returned 3.03% vs 2.59% for FCSH. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ZTRE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FCSH.

Performance

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than FCSH's 0.48% return.

ZTRE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 1Y: 3.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.76%

FCSH

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 1Y: 2.59%
• 3Y*: 5.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	$20.04K	$21.66K	$33.56K
ZTRE F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	$361.74K	$257.68K	$173.89K

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZTRE F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.80%	6.60%	0.32%
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	0.48%	6.42%	0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and FCSH is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.86

The correlation between ZTRE and FCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZTRE

ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 79
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FCSH

FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 68
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZTRE	FCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.55	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.37	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.47	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	7.25	+2.43

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FCSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and FCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum FCSH drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and FCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTRE	FCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-8.47%	+7.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-1.24%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.65%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-2.15%	+1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.42%	-0.05%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Volatility Comparison

F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) at 0.49%. This indicates that ZTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTRE	FCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	0.49%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.58%	1.65%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93%	1.98%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.10%	2.87%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.10%	2.87%	-0.77%

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZTRE vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FCSH's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	4.24%	4.14%	4.44%	2.31%	1.76%	0.04%
ZTRE F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.23%	4.37%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZTRE and FCSH in my portfolio?

ZTRE and FCSH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZTRE or FCSH?

ZTRE has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to FCSH (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs FCSH's -8.47%.

Which ETF is better, ZTRE or FCSH?

On 1-year performance, ZTRE leads with 3.03% vs 2.59% for FCSH. On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZTRE or FCSH?

Over the 1-year period, ZTRE has performed better with a 3.03% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZTRE or FCSH?

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FCSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZTRE or FCSH?

FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.23% for ZTRE.

What is the main difference between ZTRE and FCSH?

They also come from different issuers: F/m and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 0.30% for FCSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.