PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.


ZTRE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.41%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
3.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.76%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$361.74K$257.68K$173.89K

ZTRE vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.80%6.60%0.32%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and BNO is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZTRE vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTREBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.70

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

5.15

+4.53

ZTRE vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-87.06%

+85.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-34.46%

+33.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-16.21%

+16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-39.99%

+39.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

11.86%

-11.49%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) is 0.65%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that ZTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTREBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

17.47%

-16.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

40.96%

-39.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

44.54%

-42.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

36.41%

-34.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.10%

36.98%

-34.88%

ZTRE vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.23%4.37%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and BNO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to ZTRE (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 62.83% vs 3.03% for ZTRE. On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 62.83% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

ZTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BNO is Oil & Gas. ZTRE tracks ICE 3-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: F/m and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 1.00% for BNO.

ZTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer