PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTOP vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTOP achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.


ZTOP

1D
0.02%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.05%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
1.73%8.06%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTOP and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTOP vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTOP
ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOPIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

2.22

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

16.56

-14.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

58.67

-48.02

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTOP and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTOP drawdown since its inception was -2.52%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTOP and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOPIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-0.90%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-0.27%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.08%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-0.10%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.08%

+0.48%

Volatility

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that ZTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOPIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.17%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

0.67%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

0.89%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.47%

1.56%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.47%

1.56%

+1.91%

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTOP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTOP vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

ZTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
6.27%4.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTOP and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTOP has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTOP dropped -2.52% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, ZTOP leads with 5.91% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZTOP has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZTOP.

ZTOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 3.58% for IBIC.

ZTOP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ZTOP tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Top 100 Quality Select Equal Weighted Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZTOP and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTOP and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer