ZSL vs. DGP
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSL returned -38.53%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for DGP. Their -0.77 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DGP.
Performance
ZSL vs. DGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -41.40% return, which is significantly lower than DGP's -18.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSL has underperformed DGP with an annualized return of -38.53%, while DGP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 32.58%
- YTD
- -41.40%
- 1Y
- -87.23%
- 3Y*
- -64.77%
- 5Y*
- -49.69%
- 10Y*
- -38.53%
- ALL TIME*
- -41.76%
DGP
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -34.21%
- YTD
- -18.18%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 48.17%
- 5Y*
- 27.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.23M | $15.11M | $28.98M | |
| $62.12M | $66.02M | $102.33M |
ZSL vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -41.40% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | -18.18% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and DGP is -0.82, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | -0.77 |
The correlation between ZSL and DGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
DGP
ZSL vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSL | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.15 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 0.71 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 1.52 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than DGP's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and DGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -75.31% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.72% | -47.59% | -46.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | -47.59% | -50.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | -51.24% | -47.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | -51.24% | -48.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -45.56% | -54.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -41.10% | -55.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.55% | 22.26% | +52.29% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 22.62% compared to DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) at 12.46%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.62% | 12.46% | +10.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.58% | 47.60% | +48.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.38% | 55.74% | +68.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.74% | 39.73% | +36.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.98% | 35.47% | +30.51% |
ZSL vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZSL nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and DGP have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to DGP (12.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs DGP's -75.31%.
On 10-year performance, DGP leads with 16.04% vs -38.53% for ZSL. On fees, DGP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DGP has been the lower-risk option at 12.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGP has performed better with a 16.04% return vs -38.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
ZSL and DGP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ZSL is categorized as Silver, while DGP is Leveraged Commodities. ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.75% for DGP.
DGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and DGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer