DUST vs. GC=F

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Gold (GC=F).

DUST is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020.

Performance

DUST vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DUST vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares	-37.04%	-88.72%	-29.51%	-27.63%	-22.70%	-4.82%	-85.75%	-75.11%	-3.27%	-51.00%
GC=F Gold	10.61%	64.52%	27.48%	13.34%	-0.43%	-3.47%	24.59%	18.87%	-2.14%	13.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -37.04% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DUST has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of -58.91%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.

DUST

• 1D: -9.22%
• 1M: 30.85%
• YTD: -37.04%
• 6M: -55.84%
• 1Y: -86.70%
• 3Y*: -63.51%
• 5Y*: -51.99%
• 10Y*: -58.91%

GC=F

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -9.63%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 6M: 23.71%
• 1Y: 53.41%
• 3Y*: 34.44%
• 5Y*: 22.61%
• 10Y*: 14.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DUST vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUST

DUST Risk / Return Rank: 1
DUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
DUST Omega Ratio Rank: 0
DUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
DUST Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GC=F

GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 91
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUST vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUST	GC=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	1.85	-2.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.49	2.26	-4.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.34	-0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	2.74	-3.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	10.15	-11.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUST vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUST Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUST and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUST	GC=F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.94	1.85	-2.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.74	1.25	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.66	0.89	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	0.64	-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between DUST and GC=F is -0.64. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Drawdowns

DUST vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and GC=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUST	GC=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-44.36%	-55.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-91.57%	-17.73%	-73.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.68%	-20.43%	-78.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	-20.87%	-79.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-10.04%	-89.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-13.03%	-70.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.24%	4.78%	+62.46%

Volatility

DUST vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 33.98% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 11.29%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUST	GC=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.98%	11.29%	+22.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.95%	24.59%	+49.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.04%	27.77%	+64.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.89%	17.96%	+52.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.17%	16.36%	+72.81%