ZSL vs. BITO
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. ZSL is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZSL returned -69.67%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for BITO. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
ZSL vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -59.81% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -26.37% return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 5.33%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -59.81%
- 6M
- -75.78%
- 1Y
- -92.31%
- 3Y*
- -69.67%
- 5Y*
- -51.93%
- 10Y*
- -43.74%
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSL vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -59.81% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | 0.19% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and BITO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
BITO
ZSL vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | -0.95 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | -1.35 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.82 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.41 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | -0.95 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.09 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -77.86% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.55% | -50.05% | -44.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | -50.05% | -48.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -49.22% | -50.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.39% | -36.73% | -59.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.23% | 29.09% | +39.14% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 32.31% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 9.43%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.31% | 9.43% | +22.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.86% | 34.26% | +71.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.48% | 43.57% | +75.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.07% | 55.11% | +18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.20% | 55.11% | +10.09% |
ZSL vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and BITO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (32.31%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 25.27% vs -69.67% for ZSL. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 25.27% return vs -69.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 67.63%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
ZSL is categorized as Silver, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.95% for BITO.
ZSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer