ZPDF.DE vs. XLF
ZPDF.DE (SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from State Street - ZPDF.DE tracks the S&P Financials Select Sector while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPDF.DE returned 11.95%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for XLF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPDF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPDF.DE is traded in EUR, while XLF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDF.DE achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -3.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZPDF.DE having a 11.95% annualized return and XLF not far ahead at 12.35%.
ZPDF.DE
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
XLF
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDF.DE SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | -4.18% | 3.01% | 37.12% | 8.46% | -6.12% | 48.31% | -12.18% | 35.27% | -10.30% | 7.53% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -3.13% | 1.27% | 39.17% | 8.67% | -5.05% | 44.88% | -9.83% | 34.86% | -8.97% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDF.DE and XLF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ZPDF.DE and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDF.DE
XLF
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDF.DE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 0.19 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDF.DE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 0.17 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.21 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -79.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDF.DE and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDF.DE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -79.76% | +37.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -13.46% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -20.87% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.67% | -20.87% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | -42.37% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -8.94% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -21.77% | +14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 5.61% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.01%. This indicates that ZPDF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDF.DE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.01% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 11.40% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 15.26% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 18.60% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 22.67% | -1.49% |
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPDF.DE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
ZPDF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.52% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
ZPDF.DE SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDF.DE and XLF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZPDF.DE.
ZPDF.DE tracks S&P Financials Select Sector, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDF.DE and 0.08% for XLF.
Find the right allocation for ZPDF.DE and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer