ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE).
ZPDF.DE and WF1E.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPDF.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Financials Select Sector. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. WF1E.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Financials. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. Both ZPDF.DE and WF1E.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDF.DE SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | -8.61% | 3.01% | 37.12% | 14.50% |
WF1E.DE Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -4.28% | 13.85% | 32.68% | 14.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDF.DE achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than WF1E.DE's -4.28% return.
ZPDF.DE
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -8.61%
- 6M
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
WF1E.DE
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WF1E.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDF.DE
WF1E.DE
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDF.DE | WF1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | 0.30 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | 0.51 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.07 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.52 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 1.74 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDF.DE | WF1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 0.30 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.25 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDF.DE and WF1E.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDF.DE nor WF1E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than WF1E.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDF.DE and WF1E.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDF.DE | WF1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -19.97% | -22.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -14.93% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -5.90% | -7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -2.65% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 3.13% | +1.73% |
Volatility
ZPDF.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) is 4.46%, while Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that ZPDF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WF1E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDF.DE | WF1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.08% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 9.50% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 17.43% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 14.63% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 14.63% | +6.75% |