ZMUN vs. IBMP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) and IBMP (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index while IBMP tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMUN charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMP.

Performance

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMUN achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than IBMP's 1.01% return.

ZMUN

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMP

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.09%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	1.77%	0.67%
IBMP iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF	1.01%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMUN and IBMP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

ZMUN vs. IBMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBMP

IBMP Risk / Return Rank: 86
IBMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IBMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IBMP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IBMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IBMP Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZMUN	IBMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.57	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.55	—

Drawdowns

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum IBMP drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and IBMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMUN	IBMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-15.24%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.59%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.08%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-2.70%	+2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZMUN	IBMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54%	1.07%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.54%	2.56%	-2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.54%	4.99%	-4.45%

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMP's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMUN vs. IBMP - Dividend Comparison

ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than IBMP's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBMP iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.50%	2.47%	2.35%	2.05%	1.26%	0.86%	1.16%	1.06%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	2.28%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMUN and IBMP in my portfolio?

ZMUN and IBMP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZMUN or IBMP?

On fees, IBMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMUN or IBMP?

IBMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZMUN or IBMP?

IBMP has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

What is the main difference between ZMUN and IBMP?

ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index, while IBMP tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.18% for IBMP.