PortfoliosLab logo
IBMP vs. FTABX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBMP and FTABX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IBMP vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IBMP:

1.88

FTABX:

0.40

Sortino Ratio

IBMP:

2.44

FTABX:

0.47

Omega Ratio

IBMP:

1.35

FTABX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

IBMP:

0.78

FTABX:

0.31

Martin Ratio

IBMP:

11.25

FTABX:

1.01

Ulcer Index

IBMP:

0.35%

FTABX:

1.79%

Daily Std Dev

IBMP:

2.26%

FTABX:

5.39%

Max Drawdown

IBMP:

-15.24%

FTABX:

-15.53%

Current Drawdown

IBMP:

-1.02%

FTABX:

-3.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMP achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than FTABX's -1.45% return.


IBMP

YTD

1.32%

1M

0.51%

6M

0.96%

1Y

4.22%

3Y*

2.02%

5Y*

0.46%

10Y*

N/A

FTABX

YTD

-1.45%

1M

-0.47%

6M

-2.54%

1Y

2.16%

3Y*

1.96%

5Y*

1.14%

10Y*

2.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund

IBMP vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBMP vs. FTABX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBMP is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBMP is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBMP is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBMP is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBMP is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBMP is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FTABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTABX is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBMP vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IBMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMP and FTABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IBMP vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

IBMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than FTABX's 3.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.40%2.35%2.05%1.26%0.86%1.16%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.15%3.03%2.90%2.87%2.67%2.86%2.94%3.22%3.49%3.92%3.58%3.62%

Drawdowns

IBMP vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMP drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FTABX drawdown of -15.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMP and FTABX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IBMP vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) is 0.28%, while Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that IBMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...