PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBMP vs. FTABX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBMP and FTABX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

IBMP vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%-0.50%0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.00%
0.61%
IBMP
FTABX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IBMP:

1.12

FTABX:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

IBMP:

1.58

FTABX:

0.99

Omega Ratio

IBMP:

1.21

FTABX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

IBMP:

0.49

FTABX:

0.45

Martin Ratio

IBMP:

4.54

FTABX:

2.25

Ulcer Index

IBMP:

0.54%

FTABX:

1.16%

Daily Std Dev

IBMP:

2.19%

FTABX:

3.59%

Max Drawdown

IBMP:

-15.24%

FTABX:

-15.78%

Current Drawdown

IBMP:

-1.80%

FTABX:

-2.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMP achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than FTABX's 0.36% return.


IBMP

YTD

0.54%

1M

0.56%

6M

1.01%

1Y

2.25%

5Y*

0.56%

10Y*

N/A

FTABX

YTD

0.36%

1M

1.28%

6M

0.62%

1Y

2.61%

5Y*

0.77%

10Y*

2.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBMP vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for FTABX: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for IBMP: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBMP vs. FTABX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBMP is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBMP is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBMP is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBMP is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBMP is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBMP is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FTABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTABX is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTABX is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBMP vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBMP, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.030.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBMP, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.450.99
The chart of Omega ratio for IBMP, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.191.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBMP, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.450.45
The chart of Martin ratio for IBMP, currently valued at 4.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.152.25
IBMP
FTABX

The current IBMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMP and FTABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.03
0.72
IBMP
FTABX

Dividends

IBMP vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

IBMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than FTABX's 3.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.35%2.34%2.05%1.26%0.85%1.16%1.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.03%3.03%2.90%2.85%2.40%2.60%2.84%3.02%3.07%3.37%3.58%3.62%

Drawdowns

IBMP vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMP drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FTABX drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMP and FTABX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.80%
-2.02%
IBMP
FTABX

Volatility

IBMP vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) is 0.55%, while Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that IBMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.55%
1.10%
IBMP
FTABX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab