PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMP vs. MUNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMP vs. MUNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (MUNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMP achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than MUNY's 1.81% return.


IBMP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.09%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

MUNY

1D
0.08%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.07%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMP vs. MUNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBMP and MUNY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMP vs. MUNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMP
IBMP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IBMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MUNY
MUNY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MUNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMP vs. MUNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (MUNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBMPMUNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.53

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

2.48

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

8.34

+5.21

IBMP vs. MUNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the MUNY Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMP and MUNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBMP vs. MUNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMP drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than MUNY's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMP and MUNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMPMUNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-2.70%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.59%

-2.70%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.19%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-0.65%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.80%

-0.59%

Volatility

IBMP vs. MUNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) is 0.25%, while Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (MUNY) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that IBMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMPMUNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

0.73%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.77%

2.35%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07%

2.90%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

3.87%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

3.87%

+1.12%

IBMP vs. MUNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MUNY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBMP vs. MUNY - Dividend Comparison

IBMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than MUNY's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.50%2.47%2.35%2.05%1.26%0.86%1.16%1.06%
MUNY
Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.10%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBMP and MUNY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUNY has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to IBMP (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMP dropped -15.24% vs MUNY's -2.70%.

On 1-year performance, MUNY leads with 6.68% vs 2.89% for IBMP. On fees, MUNY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBMP has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUNY has performed better with a 6.68% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUNY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMP.

MUNY has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.50% for IBMP.

IBMP tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index, while MUNY tracks S&P New York AMT-Free Municipal USD10 Million Par Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMP and 0.09% for MUNY.

IBMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMP and MUNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer