ZM vs. PATH
ZM (Zoom Video Communications, Inc.) and PATH (UiPath Inc.) are both stocks. ZM operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while PATH operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ZM returned -21.27%/yr vs -31.72%/yr for PATH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZM vs. PATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZM achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -31.42% return.
ZM
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- -21.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PATH
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- -31.42%
- 6M
- -39.80%
- 1Y
- -15.23%
- 3Y*
- -16.72%
- 5Y*
- -31.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ZM vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | 17.77% | 5.73% | 13.49% | 6.16% | -63.17% | -43.02% |
PATH UiPath Inc. | -31.42% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -37.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZM and PATH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ZM and PATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ZM:
$30.51B
PATH:
$5.93B
ZM:
$6.79
PATH:
$0.61
ZM:
14.97
PATH:
18.54
ZM:
6.28
PATH:
3.63
ZM:
3.06
PATH:
3.12
ZM:
$4.93B
PATH:
$1.67B
ZM:
$3.82B
PATH:
$1.39B
ZM:
$1.90B
PATH:
$115.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZM vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank
ZM
PATH
ZM vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZM | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | -0.30 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | -0.54 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZM | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | -0.24 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | -0.50 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.47 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
ZM vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZM drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, roughly equal to the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZM and PATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZM | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -88.98% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.42% | -51.37% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -65.10% | +39.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.21% | -87.66% | +1.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.12% | -86.80% | +4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.82% | -73.74% | +10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | 28.04% | -19.05% |
Volatility
ZM vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) is 17.82%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 20.16%. This indicates that ZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZM | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.82% | 20.16% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.16% | 48.43% | -14.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.30% | 63.54% | -22.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.43% | 63.64% | -19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.52% | 64.26% | -9.74% |
Dividends
ZM vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZM nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ZM vs. PATH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoom Video Communications, Inc. and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZM vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison
ZM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a gross profit of 964.72M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
ZM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.47M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
ZM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a net income of 425.68M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 34.4%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZM and PATH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to ZM (17.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZM dropped -90.27% vs PATH's -88.98%.
ZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZM and PATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer