ZM vs. ARKQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).

ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014.

Performance

ZM vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZM vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	-6.48%	5.73%	13.49%	6.16%	-63.17%	-45.48%	395.77%	9.74%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	-0.13%	48.81%	33.88%	40.70%	-46.75%	1.74%	107.20%	5.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZM achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's -0.13% return.

ZM

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 10.97%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -0.71%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: 3.01%
• 5Y*: -24.37%
• 10Y*: —

ARKQ

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -7.58%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 72.46%
• 3Y*: 31.67%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 20.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZM vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZM

ZM Risk / Return Rank: 48
ZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
ZM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ZM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 88
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZM vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	2.00	-1.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	2.60	-1.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.33	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	3.56	-3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	11.10	-10.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZM vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZM Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZM and ARKQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	2.00	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.56	0.20	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.60	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between ZM and ARKQ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZM vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

ZM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.27%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%

Drawdowns

ZM vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZM drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZM and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-59.89%	-30.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.42%	-20.58%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.21%	-55.71%	-30.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.80%	-14.58%	-71.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.30%	-17.43%	-44.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.27%	6.60%	+2.67%

Volatility

ZM vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) is 8.62%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that ZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	11.83%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.59%	25.90%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.64%	36.50%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.77%	31.96%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.47%	29.63%	+24.84%