ZM vs. ARKQ

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

ZM (Zoom Video Communications, Inc.) is a stock, while ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) is Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past 5 years, ZM returned -23.76%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for ARKQ. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZM vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZM achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 1.72% return.

ZM

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.27%
• 6M: 12.29%
• YTD: 5.35%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: -23.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.73%

ARKQ

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -12.42%
• 6M: -13.00%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 16.98%
• 3Y*: 27.00%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 19.78%
• ALL TIME*: 16.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZM vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	5.35%	5.73%	13.49%	6.16%	-63.17%	-45.48%	395.77%	4.68%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	1.72%	48.81%	33.88%	40.70%	-46.75%	1.74%	107.20%	5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ZM and ARKQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between ZM and ARKQ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZM vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZM

ZM Risk / Return Rank: 62
ZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ZM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
ZM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZM vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.50	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	0.91	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.11	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	0.83	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.00	2.12	-0.12

ZM vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZM Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZM and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZM vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZM drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZM and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-59.89%	-30.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.92%	-20.58%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.92%	-30.76%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.19%	-55.71%	-30.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.00%	-18.91%	-65.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.13%	-17.18%	-45.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.75%	8.03%	+2.72%

Volatility

ZM vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 9.44%. This indicates that ZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZM	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.40%	9.44%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.22%	26.41%	+8.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.93%	34.38%	+8.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.50%	32.76%	+11.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.31%	30.07%	+24.24%

Dividends

ZM vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

ZM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.26%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZM and ARKQ in my portfolio?

ZM and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZM or ARKQ?

ZM has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to ARKQ (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZM dropped -90.27% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.